- Apples and oranges
6 weeks 3 days ago - Great things are coming out
12 weeks 6 days ago - Oh gosh. I guess I wasn't
14 weeks 2 days ago - this is a great activity
14 weeks 2 days ago - so....
14 weeks 2 days ago - I'm also a fan of irrelevent discussions
14 weeks 3 days ago - irrelevent discussions can be valuable
14 weeks 6 days ago - Well, I see your point.
14 weeks 6 days ago - irrelevant discussions
15 weeks 1 day ago - I really think that we
15 weeks 2 days ago
Wikipedia Disputes
So I was preparing to start off class today with a brief warning about using Wikipedia as a source when I checked out the site's entry for "globalization."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization
I was struck by the number of "dubious - discuss" tags throughout.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Globalization#Dubious
In most of this section, the discussion centers around suggested wordings and rewrites, use of evidence, etc.
I will definitely work this into my class at some point in the next week or two, but wanted to know if anyone has used this feature of Wikipedia as a teaching tool.
Thoughts or suggestions?
- gavinbenke's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 295 reads

wikipedia in the classroom
In my "Literature and Computer Programming" course, we looked at and edited this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microserfs
We had read Douglas Coupland's Microserfs, and students had plenty to add to the page. And yes, discussion pages are an excellent place to dive into a discussion of argument/rhetoric. You might also check out the Wikipedia Village Pump. This is where Wikipedia contributors hash out policies and disagreements.