- Video of Rechristening
4 weeks 10 hours ago - Jenna should have also pointed out
7 weeks 4 days ago - hi
7 weeks 4 days ago - Hmm
34 weeks 5 days ago - Another good one ...
48 weeks 2 days ago - Rob Pope
51 weeks 2 hours ago - allowing re-dos
1 year 1 week ago - Not Following Directions
1 year 1 week ago - Link to the Punctuation Made Simple
1 year 3 weeks ago - Apples and oranges
1 year 23 weeks ago
Wikipedia Disputes
So I was preparing to start off class today with a brief warning about using Wikipedia as a source when I checked out the site's entry for "globalization."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization
I was struck by the number of "dubious - discuss" tags throughout.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Globalization#Dubious
In most of this section, the discussion centers around suggested wordings and rewrites, use of evidence, etc.
I will definitely work this into my class at some point in the next week or two, but wanted to know if anyone has used this feature of Wikipedia as a teaching tool.
Thoughts or suggestions?

wikipedia in the classroom
In my "Literature and Computer Programming" course, we looked at and edited this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microserfs
We had read Douglas Coupland's Microserfs, and students had plenty to add to the page. And yes, discussion pages are an excellent place to dive into a discussion of argument/rhetoric. You might also check out the Wikipedia Village Pump. This is where Wikipedia contributors hash out policies and disagreements.