Computer Writing and Research Lab | University of Texas at Austin

In praise of showcasing

I'm using (with few adjustments) the showcasing protocol suggested for RHE 309S and RHE 310 this semester and I'm LOVING it. I've always had a hard time with peer review at UT (it always seemed to work better with my students at the last school I taught--but they were, generally, older commuter students.), but this all-class format seems to work well. Students get papers the weekend before the showcase and know that they are going to be responsible for their comments on the papers (I collect and look over the comments).

They have come to class extremely prepared and thoughtful for these sessions. They are giving each other sincere feedback--both positive and negative. I find that I have read ALL of my students papers more carefully and can use the showcase as an opportunity to to address (on sort of a meta-level) topics that they bring up with regard to each other's papers that may be pertinent to most of the papers.

I give my students a lot of credit for this--I have one student who has taken it on himself to always get the ball rolling. He seems to understand that his comments can set the tone for the conversation, and they often do. I have another student who acts as grammar police. She's great at identifying global grammar issues and giving clear and simple solutions through specific examples. Another student is fearless when it comes to dealing with the content problems that no one else will touch. She doesn't seem to get squeamish about any topic. Even my quietest students try to contribute something to the conversation.

I wonder what the trick is though? Is it the format and expectations? Is it the specific students? Is it the size of the class (I only have 12)? I'm wondering what kind of results other people have had with the showcase and what you contribute successes to . . . ?

showcasing/ways of showing student work

I'd agree that showcasing works incredibly well. I've only done it once, a few summers ago with a very small 309S class. But wow, their comments were great, their level of investment was really high, and they really took each others' work--and therefore writing and rhetoric issues--seriously. These were some of my most useful, collaborative, student-driven classes.

I like Noah's idea of pre-showcases. I find that any way of allowing students to see what other students are doing and thinking pushes everyone's work. So I love the idea of doing this kind of showing before the assignment is actually due. It seems like it could have a great impact the overall quality of papers.

I'd love to hear more ways of getting students to see what great things other students are doing. How do you build this in? (Besides peer review....)

The Case For Showcasing

I, too, have had much success with showcasing of student drafts, although I'm not sure what the "trick" is to make it work. I find that my best showcasing sessions happen when I hang back and allow the students to make the majority of comments in class on the drafts. I chime in to second what students have said or to develop their assessments in my own way, but my goal is to give them an idea of what I'm "looking for," but that they articulate first, and in their own words.

Incidentally, I'm assuming from your post that you are referring to the "showcasing" exercise that has been specifically recommended to us by the DRW--one that usually follows first drafts having been handed in and possibly returned with comments. That is, an exercise that is a supplement to the first draft-peer review-return of first draft sequence.

I do that as well, but I also have a showcasing of "pre-first drafts" from selected students that precedes the first draft hand-in. I've talked about this exercise to a number of you, my colleagues, on an informal basis, but I haven't yet written it up for E-files or anything (I keep meaning to). It involves having about three students per day sign-up to take "first crack" at the assignment in the two class days leading up to first drafts being due. So, for two class periods, we have a few "pioneer" students (all imperialistic connotations aside) show us how they responded to the assignment and tell us what difficulties they had working through the it in a number of areas, as the rest of the class is still considering how they are going to approach their own essays. I try to configure this as a writing workshop, with the class broken into groups of respondents for each paper; those groups giving their assessments (with me giving my own input); and the writer then giving us her own self-assessment.

I did this both last semester and this one, and each time its worked out really well. The students who do the showcasing have more opportunities to revise, and the students who respond get to think like editors as they plan their own essay work. I try to keep the exercise low-pressure and "rough," so that we all understand that good writing comes from multiple revisions and feedback from many different sources. And, since so much of my course is really taken up with showcasing of drafts, it puts the focus on the students' work first and foremost.

so great

Noah, you actually told me about this way of doing it---a sort of preview showcase. If I had time this semester, or teaching it again, I would try this. It seems like a great twist on the DRW's suggested protocol. You definitely SHOULD write it up for EFiles . . .